SUMMARY:
For many people, “saving
the planet” implies helping “poor” communities. International
action is necessary in cases of emergency, but it does not address
the underlying causes of the vulnerability of developing countries.
International solidarity should not be about “us” giving money,
goods and know-how to “them”; it should mean exchange. The vast
majority of international action projects actually serve the
political, diplomatic and economic interests of the giving countries
and of the local elites instead of the interests of the local
populations. “Solidarity” is also a feeling of connection with
all other beings, it is understanding that individual and global
interests merge. International solidarity becomes real through
education (sharing of knowledge) between cultures and through mutual
support. We must reinvent the practices involved in international
solidarity by thinking globally and acting locally (because local
actions have global effects). It is more efficient to “save the
planet” in a place where you have legitimacy and knowledge of the
context (such as where you live).Greenhouse gas emissions need to be
reduced. You, personally, can take steps to help reduce them by, for
example, lowering your consumption of goods and choosing an
energy-efficient lifestyle. By joining a climate action group, you
can oblige the public and private institutions to reduce emissions
too.
TRANSCRIPT:
Hi, my name is Paul,
I am an engineer in water management and, of course, a climate
activist! I worked in Bolivia and Laos for my student internships. I
am currently a volunteer for the NGO "Ingénieurs Sans
Frontières” in its “Equipe Partenariats Internationaux”.
In my work, I have to systematically question our understanding
of “international solidarity”; I will now share with you what I
have learnt about it and give you the pitfalls of wanting to get
involved in “helping poor countries”!
Introduction to international solidarity
The climate crisis increases the frequency and intensity of catastrophes throughout the world such as floods and droughts, which strike impoverished countries hardest. International action usually consists in the help from wealthy countries to support poorer countries in climate-related issues.
International solidarity
is generally presented as an act of mutual support amongst human
beings, as we all live on the same planet.
In this talk, I will try
to tackle the following questions: To what extent does humanitarian
and development aid, and international solidarity, help “save the
planet”? Where should you take action and what should
you do?
Definitions of three
types of international solidarity action:
In “International
solidarity”, the term “solidarity” describes
relationships of mutual dependence between people; it
is also a feeling that pushes them to support each other and includes
the notion of reciprocity. The term “international”
describes the scale on we are talking about.
“International
solidarity action” is a general term that is used to describe any
action of support between people from different nations. It must not
to be mistaken for “humanitarian aid” and “development aid”.
I will define these two terms, and finish by presenting the
“education to international solidarity”.
Humanitarian aid occurs
in cases of emergency (tsunamis, earthquakes, war, and
catastrophes like droughts or floods). Its aim is to solve a crisis.
It implies providing funds, food and health care from helping
countries to suffering countries. The aid is supposed to be withdrawn
once the crisis is over. However humanitarian aid rarely deals with
crises at the root, and these crisis often persist . It is a curative
solution, not a preventive one.
Example of humanitarian
aid: the global mobilisation to help Haïti recover from the 2004
earthquake and tsunami.
Development aid is
meant to help communities improve their standards of living on
the economic, social, cultural or political levels, and thus reduce
global inequalities. It also provides funds, technical knowledge and
sometimes material aid, given by a developed country to a receiving
country or community. Development aid usually takes place over a
decade at least. If humanitarian aid consists in giving a fish
to a starving man, development aid consists in teaching him how to
fish.
Example : In the project
I worked in during my internship in Laos last year, 3 million euros
were spent to help a thousand-strong farming community; it is a
5-year project. The project consists in building an irrigation
system for the dry season by bringing water from the nearby river to
the rice fields with concrete canals. This project aims at increasing
food security, and providing income that would favour access to
education and healthcare for farming families.
Humanitarian aid and
development aid would appear on the face of it very altruistic.
However, the true story is more complex. It is well known by those
who work in those fields that humanitarian and development aid are
not very effective in the long run, and can even be harmful for local
communities. The main motivation for continuing and even increasing
the funding of big international projects is that these projects
actually serve the economic, diplomatic and political interests
of the nations that are providing the money, rather than serving the
well-being of the countries that are receiving it.
Example of my internship
project : Well, in the project in which I did my last 6-month
internship in Laos, 3 million euros had already been spent for the
field studies, but nothing had been built yet in the 3 years since it
had begun. The population which was supposed to benefit from the
project was only one thousand strong. The cost was absolutely
excessive, and it is very safe to say that the benefits will not
balance the investment, even after a hundred years! Especially
knowing that irrigation systems in development aid projects are often
rendered dysfunctional within 5 years after their construction
(Ostrom).
To summarize:
humanitarian and development aid are short-term actions in developing
countries. Education for development and international
solidarity (in French : EADSI, Education au Développement et à
la Solidarité internationale) is another form of international
action all together: its aim is to make the stakeholders (that means
the people from both the “rich countries” as well as people from
the “poor countries”) better understand the complexity of the
relationships of interdependence and of exclusion in the world. Its
objective is to change people's mentalities and behaviour in order
for them to be able to contribute individually and collectively to
the construction of a fair, united and sustainable world. Action
comes last, only after the process of understanding. I
believe that it is only through this type of solidarity that we can
hope to build a better world.
Transition
Let’s look on the
bright side. It is true that some international solidarity projects
have succeeded in helping local populations. You really want to act
abroad? Go ahead, but be sure you think it through first! I'll now
give you some advice.
Primum non nocere (First,
do not harm)
Firstly, it will be
a “once in a lifetime” experience that will encourage you to
go further in your actions to save our planet on you return. You
will probably fulfil your dream: see wonderful exotic landscapes,
meet amazing people, and experience another way of life, but, as
regards “changing the world”, it may not be so straightforward...
Secondly, before going
away to “save the poor”, you should know that “developing
countries” are not always as poor and powerless as we are told on
TV, in the media, and in NGO fund-raising campaigns. They do have
their own resources and ways to tackle their problems and crises.
Example: In Nepal,
whenever a wooden irrigation dam is broken by a flood, local people
used to join forces and pool their resources to rebuild it. However,
if it is a concrete one, built by an NGO, they just can’t repair it
by themselves any more because they lack the materials and the
money. Instead of making the local people's lives easier, the
NGO's concrete dam disrupted the local economic autonomy; this is an
example of development aid that is more harmful than helpful.
These people do not lack
technical knowledge! Many may not have access to a decent education
system, but they are not without knowledge. The ancient techniques of
building dams with wood and rocks are depreciated because they are
not “modern”, but they require real expertise! Sustainability
should not be lost for the sake of modernity. Acknowledging that we
are equals with people, however “advanced” our own country,
decreases the perceived inequality of social status between modern
and more traditional communities.
Thirdly, if you really
want to make a profound change abroad, and actually improve
people’s lives, please understand that you must invest a lot of
time and effort: rather than one month of your summer break, you will
need to dedicate a substantial part of your life to it. Here is a
list of some of the common features of successful international
projects.
Advice: They usually
involve active participation of the beneficiaries at each step of the
project (field study, technical conception, consultation, funding,
governance, manual labour, rule-setting, etc.); the project is
elaborated in relation to a demand formulated by the beneficiaries;
and there is cooperation rather than conflicts of interest with
powerful local authorities such as industrialists and political
elites. (For more, read the Nobel-awarded paper Governing the
Commons, written by Ostrom, published 1990).
Transition
Answering question one :
To what extent does humanitarian and development aid, and
international solidarity, help “save the planet”?
Well, from the
perspective of an international solidarity project worker like
myself, humanitarian and development aid are not really helping the
planet. This is why I have chosen another way to practice
international solidarity, in other words, another way to support
other people and living beings on this planet. In explaining to you
how, I will be answering my second question :
Where should you take
action and what should you do ?
I should stay
Wherever you want to make
a change, go there and stay there. As I said, one month
during a summer break is not enough. My internship supervisor Nicolas
Faysse (Cirad research worker) once told me that you only begin to
understand the local context and become efficient after 5 years of
work living in a country. This is what I mean when I say that if you
want to make a change somewhere, you must dedicate an entire part of
your life to your project. In my opinion, the best place to be is in
France.
After having travelled
across the world, to Bolivia, to Laos, my conclusion is that the
place I belong, is home, in France, or at least in Europe. It might
not be the case for you; why don’t you go travel the world and see
for yourself? I’ll give you the reasons why I think I belong here,
in France, and I hope it will help you make your own opinion.
In France, you have more
legitimacy, and more efficiency. In Laos, in Bolivia, in Togo, I may
involuntarily adopt a neo-colonialist posture (very commonly, by
thinking and behaving as if I was somewhat superior), and of course,
locals will not want to cooperate. Further, development aid workers
are usually confronted with language and cultural barriers; and are
often unable to dedicate the necessary amount of time to their work,
because of the short deadlines and unrealistic objectives set by the
fund-giving agencies. These obstacles also exist in France, but they
can be more easily understood and overcome.
I’ll give you example
of language problems I met, although I had an interpreter!
I had a very hard time
asking Laotian people how they optimize water sharing, because the
concept of “optimization” does not actually exist in the Lao
language. It is not translatable.
For my work, I wanted to
schedule an interview on a Wednesday. The interpreter, translated it
as “the middle of the week”. But the Lao language is
particular... So, in order to say “middle”, he wrote “belly”
on the invitation. And this is how I ended up giving a very formal
printed paper to a local government worker, inviting him to meet me
“in the belly of the week”.
The Lao people are
extremely polite, especially towards development aid workers, so they
will not tell you when you make a mistake. And when you make a fool
of yourself, they think it is both polite and funny not to tell you.
The problem is, the Lao language is very difficult to speak for
Europeans, and so it took two weeks for me to learn how to properly
ask for “ice cubes” instead of “breast milk”.
Finally, be sure that
local action has global consequences.
Examples: Consumer
behaviour has global consequences. Buying local food avoids transport
emissions. Boycotting ultra-transformed foods has consequences on the
agro-industry! In a 2019 speech, Danone’s CEO said: “Consumers
don’t want our products any more, we must change”. But it is in
the next part of my speech that I will focus on what you can do, to
save the world.
Conclusion-Transition
Think Globally, Act
Locally!
What can I do?
Learn by reading,
listening, watching, and talking with others!
Once we begin to
understand the global situation, we may feel overwhelmed by the task,
we may feel it’s too difficult... In that case, your actions to
save the planet must be step by step. Mark my words: step by step!
That’s how I began, by talking with friends at lunchtime and by
watching ARTE documentaries. Knowledge is the fundamental fuel for
action. The media I listen to are the following: The Guardian, Le
Monde diplomatique, Radio France Internationale, Ritimo. There are
many others, but those are good to start with.
Act: it all starts with
“you”!
First, you should change
the way you eat, and the way you buy... More organic food, more local
and seasonal, less transformed food, less meat. Repair things more
often, instead of buying new things. But doing this, you are still
acting as a “consumer”, at an individual level, but more as a
consumer-actor (i.e. consuming ethically). Learn from the studies
carried out by the French Carbone 4 think-tank which show that if
every French person stuck to their list of 10 individual actions
(which Carbone 4 describes as “heroic-level” commitment), our
carbon footprint in France would decrease by 25%. The COP 21 Paris
agreement states that the decrease in the French carbon footprint by
2050 will have to be 80%. So you can see that individual action is
essential if we are to have a significant impact on greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions!
Here is the list of the
10 individual actions considered in the study:
- Become vegetarian
- Ride a bike for all
short trips
- Buy three times less
new clothes
- Eat local food
- Avoid packaged goods
- Use DEL lighting
- Stop travelling by
plane
- Decrease your home’s
temperature
- Carpooling on all
routes (2,2 people per car)
- Only buy second-hand
household appliances and hi-tech equipment
Adopt these good
resolutions gradually!
The next step: join an
action group!
Become an active member
of an association that does something you believe in: helping climate
refugees, urban gardening, picking up litter, raising awareness of
climate change, whatever. You may even set up your own association,
or just organize a project with a couple of friends without even
having the status of an association. What matters is that you get
involved in acts of solidarity that you enjoy doing, with people you
appreciate. You will gain confidence from belonging to a group, from
the support of friends and family. Check out the
website www.transiscope.org, it is a map of the many initiatives
that you may join all around the country! I particularly recommend
Les amis de la Terre, ANV-COP21, Alternatiba, and Extinction
Rebellion.
Unite! In the end, it's
all about “us”...
Now that you feel strong
and empowered, it is time to act on a broader scale, to join the
international solidarity networks, and take part in federative
actions perhaps as a volunteer in the organisation and logistics
team. This includes going on demonstrations, blockades, but there are
many peaceful and joyful federative events as well: climate camps,
solidarity festivals in summer, the Alternatiba tour of France.
Conclusion
The aim of this talk was
to give you advice on how to save the planet, from the perspective of
someone with experience in the field of international solidarity. Now
you know that humanitarian and development aid are not often very
efficient. But if you really wish to see for yourself, I encourage
you to go abroad! As I am certain it will be a memorable experience
that will encourage you to go further in your actions to save our
planet.
It is not easy to have a
positive impact. So I would suggest taking action where it is
easiest: in France rather than abroad, as you have more legitimacy,
there is no cultural barrier, and local actions have global
repercussions. Furthermore: individual actions are just as necessary
as group initiatives.
Individual actions do
make a difference: they are the first step on the ladder that will
bring us to a fairer and better world, respectful of humans and
Nature. Absolute solidarity is the feeling of connection with every
other human being; it is knowing that individual and global interests
do merge.
Thank you very much for
listening to this talk! Stay safe!
I will gladly receive any
questions or feedback on my mailbox: phaduon@engees.eu
Hello Paul and thank you for this very comprehensive work!
ReplyDeleteIf I put myself in the shoes of someone who is afraid to get involved in an action group, because I've had bad experiences, because I find it hard to listen to others, because I'm afraid that people won't listen to me, because I know that this group doesn't share political values other than those that are important to me, the environment for example, because the means used don't suit me, because it might cause me problems in my professional life or even deprive me of my civil liberties, because I think it's useless because it's not listened on a political level, because I think that we have to act quickly but that the demand is too slow to be translated into choices for society and the world, what do you advise me to do anyway, more than in my consumer choices?
PS: I'm thirty years old, I'm white, blond with blue eyes and I have French nationality. I earn a little more than the minimum wage, I'm married without children, I'm abstentionist and I have two cats
Dear Mr Anonymous, thank you for taking time to write a comment on my talk! My reply will probably not bring you life-saving enlightment, but I hope that you will find some of my advice useful... I gather from your comment that you are feeling somewhat scared and powerless? Everyone who feels concern for global issues goes through these feelings, but we learn to struggle on and be happy nonetheless. You've had bad experiences with action groups? Then do something else! You can be an “artivist”, or “stay behind the scenes” instead of taking risks in street demonstrations (though the risks are actually quite low; the latest news from Extinction Rebellion is that most police officers are actually rather supportive of XR actions...). You say you are afraid that you will not be listened to, and you find it hard to listen to others. Have you heard of "Communication Non Violente" and "Médiation Régénératrice"? These are efficient methods to help you communicate with others and manage conflict in a constructive and benevolent way, to avoid oppression and judgment; check them out! There are many associations and professionals who work with CNV. You are worried that protests are useless because they are not listened to? Well, actually, they are not useless, they are just not as world-changing as we would like them to be! Friends of mine who work for the State on environmental issues tell me that environment associations sometimes have more influence on a mayor's decision than State environment engineers do... But, you are right, certain citizens' actions sometimes indeed feel useless and, from a global point of view, they probably are... I actually find pleasure in doing what feels right, and don't care so much about the actual results. If there are some positive results after all, at a local scale, then I find purpose in it. Try to gain some satisfaction from small achievements and do not live in fear of a dark future or else you will never feel well. You should meet people who feel the same as you do. Your actions should aim at making you feel right (having a positive result is a secondary objectice). Start small: meet and bond with others. Join Facebook groups like "La collapso heureuse" or "Paumés - Makesense", read testimonies and share your own concerns and fears. Follow on FB or Instagram the news from people who are trying to see what the alternatives are, such as "Permacooltour" or "Capartdela". Let yourself be inspired by them! Explore the "desirable futures". Decrease the amount of negative information and increase the amount of positive ones. Visit alternative places such as "Eco-lieux" on your weekends. Try "Wwofing" for 1 or 2 weeks on a holiday (wwoof-france.org). And, when you begin to feel more positive, move on to more ambitious projects! In my experience, the thing to do is not, at first, to seek the best way to change the world, but the best way to feel better. It needs months, sometimes years, and quite a bit of introspection, but the best way forward is to also bond with people who share your values, ideas, fears and hopes. There is room for plenty of discussion and I am well aware that many of your questions are still unanswered, but I hope that my advice will help you a little.
ReplyDeleteRaphaël MARQUES writes: I cannot question the content of your talk, since you travelled to places and worked on cases I have not, and you are a professional, so you are undoubtedly right. However, I do have a few questions... Since humanitarian aid is for emergency situations, why are we not constantly sending or receiving aid? I mean, we are living through a global climate crisis and no country will be spared! I understand that aid has to be well managed but why are there no policies which oblige us (the wealthy countries) to help fund this aid? Our wealth is huge and we could easily support the poor countries suffering from the effects of global warming; are politicians and shareholders the only ones to blame for this lack of action? As concerns individual action, the task is daunting! What makes me want to give up is that the majority doesn’t even care about the climate emergency. Most people know about it, but their behaviour (like eating fast-food twice a week, or buying overpriced equipment, etc.) contributes even more to the destruction of Earth. Are the actions you suggest enough? I'm not sure we are up to the task...
ReplyDelete