My parents made the
choice to get rid of their old diesel car and buy an "eco-friendly"
electric one. But, what's the point? 80% of electricity in France is
nuclear!
When my friends and I go
for a long walk in the mountains, we sometimes pick up litter; it's
our good deed for the day. But, what's the point? Every year,
millions of tons of rubbish are not recycled, just buried in
landfills!
I take the train, not the
plane, to go on holiday abroad now, because the train pollutes less.
But, what's the point? There are over 6,000 very large, very
polluting, container ships in the world, transporting a lot of stuff
that could easily be made much closer to the consumers, to avoid
transport!
I switch off lights and
turn off taps and only flush the loo when really necessary. But
what's the point? Bill Gates travels by luxury private jet and has
just spent 500 million dollars on a yacht!
I'm really pleased and
proud to be able to vote soon. But, what's the point? Whoever I vote
for will not be able to do much against the petrochemical,
agribusiness or pharmaceutical lobbies!
I am asking you, ladies
and gentlemen, fellow delegates, what’s the point of me, my family
and my friends, trying to be virtuous eco-friendly citizens, when the
multinational firms, when the State and local authorities, and when
wealthy individuals do so little to "save the planet"?
Do you remember the
Conference Of Parties 21 (COP21 if you prefer) that took place in
Paris in November 2015? Everyone was very proud of the results: the
countries that signed the final agreement would finally act to fix
the environmental problems that we are causing. The climatologists
were finally listened to; their research was at last taken seriously.
I remember that every media was talking about it like it was the
event of the century, the beginning of a new era, an era of more
responsible production and consumption. Because this event aimed to
try to limit global warming to under 2°C!? You and I know that that
is not enough and that, in fact, we will never be able to keep
temperature rise under 2°C...
Let’s be realistic: we
live in a globalized economy where predatory capitalism, based on
unfettered competition, overexploitation of the resources,
materialistic individualism and hedonistic overconsumption, is the
rule. “Sustainable development” does not get a look in! It's pure
utopia, it's just greenwashing! Just like the COP21; what
multilateral agreements are respected?: the UN, the EU, the
governments are all useless! At least Trump cannot be accused of
hypocrisy when he pulled the USA out of the agreement! The other
countries, including France, have basically done nothing to reduce
global warming. Why? Because transnational companies pull the
strings; governments are at their mercy. Do you really think
shareholders care about democracy, the poor, the future generations,
the planet?
Am I being pessimistic or
realistic? Is there a way out? Is grassroots action a solution?
“Grassroots action” simply means you and I, ordinary people,
trying to do something at our level, individually and collectively,
to improve our lives. But only a tiny percentage of people are angry
enough or crazy enough to go out and protest on the streets to try
and influence public opinion, to put pressure on governments and
businesses; have they been able to do anything to improve the
conditions of the workers, the poor, women, minorities, refugees, the
children in hunger-stricken and war-torn regions of the world?
Basically, no is the answer. And do you honestly think a teenage
girl, however bright and brave, can, even with the support of
thousands of young people, halt doomsday? You can join
FridaysForFuture or even Greenpeace or Friends of the Earth, or
welcome refugees in your village, boycott products, turn off taps and
switch off lights and peddle to school all you want, but will that be
enough to stem the tide? You can also believe, if you like, the
sincerity of the billionaires and populist presidents when, in the
luxury of the Swiss village of Davos, they cry crocodile tears and
applaud Greta Thunberg, vowing to make amends, promising to green
their factories and share dividends a little more...
The vast majority of
people would have to get seriously involved if grassroots action is
to be effective. I don't see that happening: the less poor do not
want to change their habits to lose what little comfort and sense of
security they have, and the very poor are just trying to make ends
meet, day to day. No, if the planet is to remain inhabitable, it's up
to the wealthy and mighty. But, why would they want to lose all their
advantages? According to Oxfam, the world’s richest 1% have more
than twice as much wealth as 6.9 billion people, while nearly half of
the world’s population - 3.4 billion people - is living on less
than $5.50 a day… The powerful are compromising the survival of
“the people”, but do they really care about that? Why should
Bezos share his $145 billion fortune or Bolsonaro prevent the
rainforest going up in smoke or Putin stop slaughtering Syrian
families or Trump disappoint his followers?
If anyone survives, it'll
be them, the corrupt leaders and the mega-wealthy. When we will all
be dying of disease, thirst and hunger, from fires or floods, they’ll
be playing golf in luxury bunkers or sipping cocktails on their
private islands, chuckling away to themselves at how weak and
gullible we all are..
Good points! But I would say that leaders and affluent people are as likely to die from diseases or catastrophes as common people. The coronavirus for instance seems to hit anyone anywhere, no matter how poor or wealthy they are. As to the consequences of the excesses of our civilisation, in the end we are all in the same boat I think. But I agree that if things don't change at a global level, there is little we can do as individuals to steer the boat in an entirely new direction.
ReplyDeleteHenri Duran, inspector for secondary schools
Elise GAUTHIER writes: Do the powerful really do nothing? Ecological measures have been taken and are being implemented. Not everything is negative, surely? Examples: in 2018, public transport was made free in Dunkirk, a measure that has helped to relieve congestion in the city centre and which has therefore contributed to a considerable reduction in pollution there. As of January 1st 2019, people can no longer purchase and use synthetic pesticides such as glyphosate in their personal gardens. Chemical pesticides of all kinds have been banned from our supermarkets. My father, who is in public works, has to comply with certain standards for his vehicles so that they do not produce polluting substances. These are small-scale, but they show that the government is trying to implement eco-friendly measures.
ReplyDeleteMaxence repeatedly asks: "what’s the point?". That bothers me; I can understand that making individual efforts may seem pointless, but if everyone starts asking themselves that question, we will never move forward! Making a personal effort for the environment is obviously useful and can even provide a sense of personal satisfaction.
It is not just the powerful that pollute! The lack of education and of means in countries such as India also result in damage to the environment. The economy will always come before ecological considerations, that’s for sure, but the powerful cannot do just what they want to do: there are laws, procedures, standards! I think Maxence is wrong too to say the powerful do not really care about the people.
The powerful exist, surely, because we, the “people”, allow them to exist. We want mobile phones, televisions, internet connection, etc. and all the creature comforts. If we did not use the goods and services of Apple, Google, etc., they would not dominate the market and control our lives! If we stuck to just satisfying our basic needs, the economy would not be what it is. Most people want more: more progress, more technology, more growth. But, if we are to pollute less, we should boycott these huge companies.
I disagree with M. Duran: the rich are not "in the same boat" as the rest of us, literally. The wealthy can avoid contamination in their super yachts (like they can avoid most of the negative impacts of global warming in their hideaways)!
ReplyDeleteCf. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/24/billionaires-coronavirus-not-in-the-same-boat
Things cannot be changed at a global level because the very wealthy (who are the principal cause of the overexploitation of natural resources and of pollution) do everything to maintain their control, as Maxence points out, over the globalized economy. They do so by weakening international organizations (Trump stopping funding to the WHO in the middle of a pandemic is just the latest example), and supporting dangerous leaders like Bolsonaro (the Amazon is going up in flames so that soya fields can be planted for the meat industry!), and using cheap labour from totalitarian or extremely corrupt countries (thus maintaining their status quo).
I think Maxence is right to blame the super-rich and deplore the lack of leadership. However, I think that we, "the people", are willing victims: who buys all the things the 1% make their money from selling and who votes for the populist politicians? We are just as guilty of the climate crisis as the selfish rich or useless "deciders"!
We have the power as consumers to buy wisely (to buy locally and to buy organic products, to boycott companies that produce things that are bad for the environment, that are produced in bad conditions, that are bad for our health). Also, we still have, in most countries, the power as citizens to vote intelligently and get involved in democratic initiatives. What's the point of getting involved in climate action, Maxence? Our very survival! As you say, they, the powerful, don't care (think of Trump encouraging people to go back to work despite the risks to their health!) but, do we? If the planet is to be saved, it's up to us, the people!
Maximilien BIDET writes: Maxence, I think the wealthiest people do react, but only when they come face-to-face with the problems. For example, Boris Johnson, the British Prime Minister, said that Coronavirus was not a serious problem (he said something like: "you just have to catch the disease and after that you will be OK"), but after he was put in intensive care, having caught the disease himself, he changed his opinion about how serious the pandemic actually is...
ReplyDeleteSome rich people give to worthy causes because it's good for their public image. Virgil Abloh, millionaire founder of a luxury brand, made a donation to Black Lives Matter recently. It's a worthy initiative, but he only gave $50! The saddest thing about this is that he wrote about how proud he was (how generous he felt) to have given all of $50 to BLM...